From: Taylor R. Campbell Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:52:36 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Add comment about disagreement between compiler and microcode over X-Git-Tag: 20090517-FFI~16 X-Git-Url: https://birchwood-abbey.net/git?a=commitdiff_plain;h=26f7e3640a2ceca08c446d981aa28fedc2f2e19b;p=mit-scheme.git Add comment about disagreement between compiler and microcode over architecture names. --- diff --git a/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac b/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac index 862bec43c..f4f85d08d 100644 --- a/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac +++ b/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. AC_INIT([MIT/GNU Scheme microcode], [15.1], [bug-mit-scheme@gnu.org], [mit-scheme]) -AC_REVISION([$Id: configure.ac,v 1.63 2009/04/30 17:48:45 riastradh Exp $]) +AC_REVISION([$Id: configure.ac,v 1.64 2009/04/30 17:52:36 riastradh Exp $]) AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([boot.c]) AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h]) AC_PROG_MAKE_SET @@ -955,6 +955,11 @@ svm) no|none) ;; *) + dnl This is not quite right, because the compiler and microcode + dnl disagree abou what some architectures should be called, such as + dnl bobcat vs mc68k or spectrum versus hppa. I don't know what the + dnl state of Scheme on these architectures is, however, so at least + dnl this will flag an error if you try to use them. if test -f "cmpauxmd/${enable_native_code}.m4"; then SCM_ARGH="${enable_native_code}" else