From 26f7e3640a2ceca08c446d981aa28fedc2f2e19b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Taylor R. Campbell" <net/mumble/campbell>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:52:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add comment about disagreement between compiler and microcode
 over architecture names.

---
 v7/src/microcode/configure.ac | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac b/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac
index 862bec43c..f4f85d08d 100644
--- a/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac
+++ b/v7/src/microcode/configure.ac
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.
 
 AC_INIT([MIT/GNU Scheme microcode], [15.1], [bug-mit-scheme@gnu.org], [mit-scheme])
-AC_REVISION([$Id: configure.ac,v 1.63 2009/04/30 17:48:45 riastradh Exp $])
+AC_REVISION([$Id: configure.ac,v 1.64 2009/04/30 17:52:36 riastradh Exp $])
 AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([boot.c])
 AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
 AC_PROG_MAKE_SET
@@ -955,6 +955,11 @@ svm)
 no|none)
     ;;
 *)
+    dnl This is not quite right, because the compiler and microcode
+    dnl disagree abou what some architectures should be called, such as
+    dnl bobcat vs mc68k or spectrum versus hppa.  I don't know what the
+    dnl state of Scheme on these architectures is, however, so at least
+    dnl this will flag an error if you try to use them.
     if test -f "cmpauxmd/${enable_native_code}.m4"; then
 	SCM_ARGH="${enable_native_code}"
     else
-- 
2.25.1