Next: Condition Instances, Previous: Condition Handling, Up: Error System [Contents][Index]
The Scheme error system provides a mechanism, known as restarts,
that helps coordinate condition-signalling code with condition-handling
code. A module of code that detects and signals conditions can provide
procedures (using with-simple-restart
or with-restart
) to
be invoked by handlers that wish to continue, abort, or restart the
computation. These procedures, called restart effectors, are
encapsulated in restart objects.
When a condition object is created, it contains a set of restart
objects, each of which contains a restart effector. Condition handlers
can inspect the condition they are handling (using find-restart
to find restarts by name, or condition/restarts
to see the entire
set), and they can invoke the associated effectors (using
invoke-restart
or invoke-restart-interactively
).
Effectors can take arguments, and these may be computed directly by the
condition-handling code or by gathering them interactively from the
user.
The names of restarts can be chosen arbitrarily, but the choice of name is significant. These names are used to coordinate between the signalling code (which supplies names for restarts) and the handling code (which typically chooses a restart effector by the name of its restart). Thus, the names specify the restart protocol implemented by the signalling code and invoked by the handling code. The protocol indicates the number of arguments required by the effector code as well as the semantics of the arguments.
Scheme provides a conventional set of names (hence, protocols) for
common use. By choosing the names of restarts from this set, signalling
code can indicate that it is able to perform a small set of fairly
common actions (abort
, continue
, muffle-warning
,
retry
, store-value
, use-value
). In turn, simple
condition-handling code can look for the kind of action it wishes to
perform and simply invoke it by name. All of Scheme’s conventional
names are symbols, although in general restart names are not restricted
to any particular data type. In addition, the object #f
is
reserved to indicate the “not for automated use” protocol: these
restarts should be activated only under human control.
Restarts themselves are first-class objects. They encapsulate their
name, a procedure (known as the effector) to be executed if they
are invoked, and a thunk (known as the reporter) that can be
invoked to display a description of the restart (used, for example, by
the interactive debugger). Invoking a restart is an indication that a
handler has chosen to accept control for a condition; as a consequence,
the effector of the restart should not return, since this would
indicate that the handler declined to handle the condition. Thus, the
effector should call a continuation captured before the
condition-signalling process began. The most common pattern of usage by
signalling code is encapsulated in with-simple-restart
.
Within this chapter, a parameter named restarts will accept any of the following values:
condition/restarts
is called on the
condition, and the resulting list of restarts is used in place of the
condition.
bound-restarts
. The procedure bound-restarts
is called (with no arguments), and the resulting list of restarts is
used in place of the symbol.
bound-restarts
.
• Establishing Restart Code: | ||
• Invoking Standard Restart Code: | ||
• Finding and Invoking General Restart Code: | ||
• The Named Restart Abstraction: |
Next: Condition Instances, Previous: Condition Handling, Up: Error System [Contents][Index]